Back to the Classics, 2017 Wrap Up

What a fascinating third year of the Back to the Classics challenge. This challenge suits me, my personality is satisfied by reading of varied classics. What I like it’s to go for at least one solid and intimidating classic, some well established ones, fun classics, minor classics, and obscure classics.

I’ll tell you a bit about each of these 12 titles. Dr. Thorne by Trollope is everything you expect in an English Victorian novel. I met unforgettable people, and the story was reminiscent of Great Expectations. Trollope’s humor and skill to shape characters is fabulous. This is my dear friend Linda’s favorite author, and I now understand why.

My twentieth century classic, Night, was less than I expected, yet it’s always important to read books like this, no doubt. It’s good to have some distance now, for I find myself more able to talk about the books now in context. Pavilion of Women was another less than expected title. I still like to have read it, and I plan to read her Portrait of a Marriage, following my friend Lisa’s advice. I believe Pearl Buck knew the east well, she observed and was part of their culture, no doubt. The book, however, did not feel fresh, it had a bit of contrivance, specially the second part. It had some bright moments. I guess I can call it uneven.

We come to Nazarín. It was wonderful. Galdós is my favorite author, and he wrote a very singular book, an ingenious story with unforgettable characters, and much to think about. Nazarín is a candid soul, a humble priest that becomes entangled in unfortunate events. This makes him take the plunge and cut the strings with society as much as possible. He goes on an indefinite pilgrimage, but the more he just wants to live, without asking for anything, the more he attracts others who want to follow him, or partake of his wisdom.

In Praise of Folly was a book I thought would be difficult. I found it very reachable, humorous and full of wisdom. I guess they say we miss the very many references to people and things of his life, but honestly, who cares? One can read it without previous knowledge (as I did), and have a blast. Bonus: it’s short. It’s sort of a book of maxims, quotes, witticisms.

Next in line, Madam Bovary. Most people loath this book, and many also love it. I find it super worth reading, despite the fact it falls like a bomb. After it, or while, try to read something light and inspiring. They always say the writing is beautiful, and translation here is very controversial, at the same time there’s a new English translation very praised. I read it in Spanish. I still appreciated the beauty of some passages. My favorite in this book full of despicable characters, was the atmosphere and the descriptions of irrelevant moments in the life of these people. I’ve read many wonderful reviews by ordinary people. One of them stack to my mind, a man who read it while younger, and later in life. I do agree with him that we read ourselves into the book. I don’t mean if you don’t like it there’s something wrong in you. Not at all, lol. As many classics, this may not be the one for you. Many don’t make their way inside this book. I did. I was swallowed by it. Since I’m a person of faith, to me it was a clear picture of a woman who grew up without any, and who did not find it at all, not by herself, nor in those around her. This book is a perfect negative of the christian life. Pure learning by contrast, and pure joy in possibly the only thing Flaubert himself was able to love, France, France as an idea (the countryside, the air, the good that to him was gone.)

It’s Northanger’s Abbey’s turn. This is the book that non Austen fans love the most, (or so I heard.) Out of my only 3 Austen titles, (this, Emma, and Pride and Prejudice), I like this one the most. It’s candid and refreshing. I note that this is not her highest accomplishment, though. It seems as if she was getting practice and having fun at it! I still like and respect her as much as to read one of her books every year.

Ten Fingers for God. A favorite biographical book, (though written by a third person.) I learned and laughed with this book so much. This book relates most of the life of Dr. Pauld Brand, a man who was a renown person in the world of medicine, for his research and life of service to those with leprosy. It’s always wonderful to read about men and women of courage, their upbringing and all they overcame at the difficult period of the first half of the 20th century. It’s very moving without being saccharine. (I loathe saccharine and preachy books.)

Planet of the Apes was a fun romp. The first movie adaptation is one of my favorites, but the book is different, a surprise. I did not know the author also wrote The Bridge over the River Kwai! This type of philosophical dystopias, with a good amount of action too, are delightful. I wish it had been longer.

After You, Marco Polo. I read this title for a second time, It had been 4 years since my first time reading it, and I wanted to travel with the Shor couple once more to all those recondite and exotic places. I wish Jen had written other travel log books. Her sense of humor and story telling skills have no match.

We come to the last two books, El Jarama (The River), which I just finished, and Brothers Karamazov, the first title I read. El Jarama is a somehow obscure classic, one I’m glad I recovered from oblivion. This was no doubt the perfect time for me to read a book like this. It surprised me, it was better than expected. No hero, almost no action, just one Sunday at the river. Madridians are arriving at the river, and also at a nearby restaurant. Mostly dialogues (brilliant dialogues), the book is a realist account of that day, like a fly on the wall, the author points to different vignettes, until something tragic comes upon them. Last, but not least, Brothers Karamazov. I cannot write Brothers K for short, since that’s a different book, (one who sounds mighty interesting as well.) This is, to date, my favorite Dostoevsky title. Intense. Robust. Russian. And typical Dostoevsky too. I enjoyed reading it in company. These are classics I like to read along with friends, to ensure I don’t give up -in the event that it is a challenging one-, and to be able to discuss and exchange opinions.

This was all. Thanks for reading. Below I have listed them all again with links to their respective reviews.

1. A 19th Century Classic – any book published between 1800 and 1899: I listened to Dr. Thorne, by Trollope

2. A 20th Century Classic – any book published between 1900 and 1967: Night, Elie Wiesel, Marion Wiesel. My review.

3. A classic by a woman author: Pavilion of Women, Pearl Buck, 1946. 

4. A classic in translation: Nazarín, by Benito Pérez Galdós

5. A classic published before 1800: In Praise of Folly, Erasmus of Rotterdam

6. An romance classic: Madame Bovary, by Flaubert

7. A Gothic or horror classic: Northanger’s Abbey

8. A classic with a number in the title:Ten Fingers for God, by Dorothy Clarke Wilson, published in 1965.

9. A classic about an animal or which includes the name of an animal in the title:
Planet of the Apes, (El planeta de los simios), Pierre Boulle

10. A classic set in a place you’d like to visit. It can be real or imaginary: After You, Marco Polo, by Jen Shor.

11. An award-winning classic. El Jarama, or The River, by Rafael Sánchez Ferlosio.

12. A Russian Classic: The Brothers Karamazov

14 thoughts on “Back to the Classics, 2017 Wrap Up

  1. I have noticed that you have blogged less than usual. I have to comment in your latest post.
    I am interested in knowing what you think about MB.

  2. Great job! You’ve got months to spare! I’m a bit behind (on this challenge, and blogging, and everything), but still trucking away. Not sure I’ll finish all of mine this year, but it’s still fun to join in. You’ve reminded me that I need to read Madam Bovary soon!

  3. Oh, no… I hope your life goes back to normal soon, so that you can resume with your reading and feel better.

  4. Oh, well done, Silvia! I have a few to go yet. My reading time has evaporated recently between a bout of the flu, sick kids, lots more washing & looking after my mum. You chose a great variety here.

  5. That’s great to hear, Karen. And you know, you can participate with 3, 6, or 12 classics, I believe, or 6, 9, and 12, it says it in the wrap up post that Karen has up in her blog.
    The Trial is an easy one. I totally thought this was a denser more difficult book. It’s a super easy read.

  6. Congratulations on completing the challenge! I’m working on finishing The Brothers Karamazov right now, along with a couple of other classics, all while reading The Trial with you! 🙂 I decided yesterday what I officially wanted to do for these last few months of the year for reading. I had two classics that I’ve worked on reading off and on this year that I decided I wanted to get finished and that’s The Brothers Karamazov and A Tale of Two Cities. I also want to read Frankenstein. So I made a reading plan to space out the reading of these to finish them up by the first of December, along with reading The Trial with you per your schedule.

    As you know, the first time I attempted the Back to Classics Challenge, I ended up only reading one book that qualified for the challenge (even though I read many books that year). That was 2015. I haven’t attempted that challenge since. So imagine my surprise when I was looking over my list of books read this year, and looking at the ones I’m finishing up over these next couple of months, that I found that I have actually read classics that look like they fit all of the categories for this year’s Back to Classics Challenge! I was so excited when I discovered that! Also, for some reason, that first year I tried it (in 2015) I think I must have somehow thought children’s classics couldn’t count. But when reading over the guidelines yesterday, I saw that you can count up to three children’s classics!

    Anyway, I’m just so tickled that I actually will probably have completed this challenge by the first of December even though I wasn’t trying to do the challenge. LOL That has seriously made me want to give it a go for this coming year!

  7. I always enjoy your comments a lot, Ganeida-Jehanne. I love how so different people like us, come together through books. I am also a, more than Tolstoy.

  8. I can’t read Tolstoy but I love Dostoevsky ~ & Brothers is my favourite. I rather liked Bovary when I read it many years ago. Not sure what I would think of it now. I am not an Austen fan though my girls brought all the movies into the house so I have some idea of the storylines. Like Pearl Buck. She was very popular when I was young & I’ve read quite a few of hers, probably because The Big Wave was a birthday present one year. And Nazarin sounds interesting ~ though when I will find the time I don’t know. ☺

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s